Convicts without Borders: Doing the Private Prison Shuffle

Rapid Expansion: ABCnews. This original story posted on ABCnews.com complimented report for Nightline (1998). 

By DAVID PHINNEY

NEW YORK -- Looking for cheap labor, inexpensive land and obliging local officials to build your next prison?

How about locating in Mexico ?

Arizona is doing just that-considering plans to ship its convicts to a private prison across the border.

However, officials warn the plan isn’t a done deal.

“We’re just in a holding pattern right now,” Arizona Department of Corrections spokesman Michael Arra cautioned

But in the new socioeconomics of private prisons, it doesn’t always matter where the inmates come from -- or where they go. Some companies eagerly ship prisoners thousands of miles around the country to cut costs and improve profit margins.

Communities Ready to Cut Deals

“The governmental customer is looking for one single thing and that is how to save money,” says Susan Hart, spokeswoman for the Corrections Corporation of America , the nation’s largest private-prison firm. “We can save money. It is primarily a cost-efficiency -driven process.”

Private prisons in Arizona now welcome inmates from Alaska . Puerto Rico sends convicts to corporate-run jails in New Mexico . Prisoners who broke Oregon state laws find themselves serving time in Tennessee . Hawaii sends women criminals to Texas .

A key part of the business plan calls for finding communities ready to cut deals for the jobs a new prison can deliver.

“Every month I see another prison going up around the country as part of an economic development program,” says Adrian T. Moore, a privatization expert with the Reason Foundation, a libertarian think-tank. “They bring in a lot of money to the local economy.”

Legal Loopholes, Flights of Freedom

But like any business, prison companies are secretive about what goes on behind their walls. Sometimes, the community that courted the private prison company pays an unexpected price.

When two inmates hopped the fence at the Houston Processing Center in Texas , local officials were stunned. They figured the private facility was just a holding pen for illegal immigrants. Little did they know the owner contracted out empty beds for some 200 Oregon sex offenders-including the two that escaped.

The Houston police were even more surprised when they discovered Texas lacked specific laws that make it illegal to escape from a private prison. Jumping the fence of a private prison was no worse than quitting a job. Yet, the Corrections Corporation of America expected the police to track down the convicts -- and pick up the tab for doing so.

Eleven days later, the escaped prisoners were busted-for auto theft. The Texas legislature rushed to pass laws addressing the matter, but other states continue to learn the hard way.

One year after the first private prison opened in Youngstown , Ohio , the legislature there passed its first laws applying to it. Politicians were furious when they learned the company that ran the prison, CCA, had brought in hundreds of dangerous inmates from Washington , D.C. ’s overcrowded prison.

‘A Case of Dumping’

Youngstown Mayor George McKelvey says he appreciates the jobs, but mistrusts the prison operator, CCA.

Ohio stopped out-of-state landfill a while ago because people don’t want it in their communities,” says McKelvey of the private 1,700-bed prison.

“This is a case of dumping, too,” he says. “The dumping of undesirables from other states. I don’t know how receptive the community would have been if we knew they were going to bring in Washington , D.C. ’s worst criminals.”

CCA officials said the disagreement stemmed from a misunderstanding about the specifics of the security classification Youngstown ’s prison had, and that all new prisons go through adjustment periods.

Others note that interstate transfers are routine in the federal system as well.

“If you were popped for a federal crime in Seattle , there is a very real chance you could serve time in a federal prison in Miami ,” notes Charles Thomas, criminology professor at the University of Florida .

That wasn’t the case with state prisons, however, until private companies discovered their winning formula.

“If you are tried and convicted in the name of the state, then you should be held by the auspices of the state,” says American University law professor Ira Robbins, who has written against privatization for the American Bar Association.

“I want to see the name of the state on a guard’s uniform, not ‘Acme Corrections’ or whatever. I want them to know they have violated the state’s norms and be reminded of that by the state, not just someone who is making a profit on the inmates.”

 

 
 
 
 
 
 

Website Created by Red Dot Creative Media

All rights reserved. Reproduction without permission is strictly prohibited.

Copyright 2005,  David Phinney